- Topic
- Reframing ADHD distractibility from character flaw to nervous-system response — what feels urgent vs. what's important, and why shame compounds the pattern
- Arc
- Reframe arc: cover hook → reframe 1 (urgency vs. importance) → reframe 2 (nervous system, not character) → reframe 3 (novelty-seeking as regulation) → reframe 4 (shame compounds it) → reframe 5 (working with it, not against it) → CTA
- Hook
- Validation-driven, gentle reframe — 'isn't a flaw' directly counters shame without clickbait
- Voice
- Calm, warm, clinical but accessible — plain language, no slang, translates nervous-system concepts in the same breath, no emoji, echoes 'symptoms as doorways' framing
- CTA
- Assigned 'Save this for later' — worded naturally as headline + sub on final slide, no urgency
- Constraints
- No productivity-hack framing per rule 3; no outcome promises; plain language per voice rules; reframe arc per rule 3 preference list; no diagnosis-by-checklist per rule 1; CTA from approved list per rule 8; educational disclaimer where warranted per rule 11